I like DXO PureRAW (when it has support) because I can open that RAW data from the camera (ORF file) and output to a DNG (universal RAW format) to further develop in ACR - I use Bridge, though know most will use LR, or whatever else they prefer. Note: Topaz offers a free trial, and you can save 15 off when purchasing Gigapixel. This is the reason you can't use a RAW file in publishing, presentation, or web site creation, to note three common categories of programs that use images. Our site is not affiliated with the developer. It is critical to understand that the ORF isn't a picture yet - just data off the sensor. ![]() it will be saved as an actual image format, be it TIF, JPG, or whatever you choose. Insightful articles and videos to help you improve your photo and video quality. I can't speak to Lightroom - I don't use it, but Adobe Bridge, which uses the same ACR RAW interpretation engine, opens OM-1 RAW files just fine - as soon as you open the file in whatever you choose, PS, LR, etc. I hope they will introduce full support for OM-1 files soon. If I want to edit from Lightroom it converts it to a TIFF first. If I try to open an OM-1 file direct into the standalone software it doesn't recognise it. But it doesn't go back to PS as a RAW file when saved as it has to be converted to a TIFF, JPEG or PSD file. If I open an ORF file in Photoshop I can send it to Topaz DeNoise or Sharpen and it will edit and return it to PS. Standalone versions do not yet accept OM-1 RAW. If the file opens in an external editor outside the Topaz workbench, then you probably opened the file without selecting an editor. Hope this reply from DxO’s support team answers, or at least gives some clarity to previous questions asked by forum members.Topaz DN and Sharpen AI are both available as plugins for PS and work with OM-1 RAW files. Thank you for contacting DxO Customer Support. If the Topaz Studio free trial period is over, but you don’t want to pay for the licensed version or use pirated software, I have prepared for you several equally effective free alternatives. ![]() By following the above workflow, you will find that you can rely on PhotoLab to always deliver the best results possible. The other post-production programs you mentioned do not contain any of the advanced production code contained in PhotoLab. ![]() ORIGINAL CAMERA FILE > DXO PHOTOLAB > ALL OTHER POST-PRODUCTION PROGRAMS > FINAL PHOTO RESULT The resulting code is so precise, that the use of processed files in the program can cause unexpected and unsupported results. All of the modules used in PhotoLab are constructed using extremely precise measurements of actual output files from specific camera and lens configurations. In order to get the best, and most consistent, results from DxO PhotoLab, we recommend that you always use the original and unmodified photo files from your camera in the program and then use all other post-production programs. Topaz Studio gives you lightning fast results with Topaz’s exclusive image processing technology, in an intuitive, affordable, easy to use application. Below is DxO support’s explanation and their recommendation. ![]() From a file size standpoint, ON1 gets the closest to the original size which is what I’d consider the best case scenario. Features of Topaz Studio 2022 This is all your Topaz products wrapped into one program The Main Toolbar gives you options to open and save images Search for. Changes in File Sizes All percentages shown are relative size to the original for each section. From what I have read on this forum, other users are experiencing similar problems. The Original column are the sizes of the the source file then the sizes saved to disk after being downsized in Photoshop. Received a reply today () from support to my question about DxO PhotoLab 4’s perceived compatibility issue with TopazLabs Sharpen AI (current version), with regards to.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |